Why US politicians call for a call to Kiev
With a scattered majority of Democrats like Republicans, the United States representatives house called to the Ukrainian government too "Dead weapons" to deliver. The US high-commands of NATO demand afterwards; In the terrain of the western neighbors of Ukraine and Russia, the transatlantic covenant builds a second front. The Minsk Agreement Nr. 2 is hardly taken seriously.
The Ukrainian Prasident Poroshenko on Wednesday at the reception of the first delivery of Humvees, so from so-called "non-tonic" weapons. Image: President.gov.among others
In the US political class, the urge dominates "hybrid" War around Ukraine the military component to strongly sharpen and thus to quickly grew the geopolitical confrontation with Russia. With a "gross" or even atomic military conflict between Moscow and Washington is apparently not calculated, but probably with a continuation of violence in Ukraine and other sanctions against the Russian economy. Thus differences between the US Russian policy and the emergence of EU countries, especially the Federal Republic, consolidate, the superpower does not worries; a steamer for Europe’s ordilities has apparently conkined them. Why are US politicians like that?
The fact that the fighting place has Ukraine’s threading consequences for her own society must not burred, Kiev is far from Washington. On permanent exchange with Russia, the US economy — unlike the Federal Republic — is not dependent; not even on Russian energy offers, which she wants to displace it from the European market. Negative effects of sanctions for sanctions do not affect the USA. The costs for the maintenance of the fighting area Ukraine and the confrontational Russian policy should take over the most important EU countries.
That in this way in Russia militant "patriotism" continues to stimulate, must not be storing on a long period of view. Calling brings the Russian state into additional economic problems. Putin’s regime can then suffer confidence loss, but does not help martial presentation in the long term. In the US thoughtful world, the expectation ranges in Moscow so regime change in progress, a kind of new Jelzin will then joke in the Kremlin, to lose Russia as a geopolitical competitor of the USA and possible permanent partners of China’s significance.
Before a worldwide "hybrid" Aggression of Russian politics, the US does not have to be afraid; They are strategically and economically in an absolutely better position. That putin "master the globe" Wool is given that only a propagandist construct.
Conclusion: The people in the Ukrainian terrain, whether the Kiev government or the separatists are not to be expected with civilian ratios. They remain victims of a policy, the violence, in different shapes, for the naturalest in the world.