At the latest since mid-2002, as a memo of the British government and the increasing bombing of Iraqi goals along the aircraft zones shows, the invasion of the US has a decided thing
The terrorist attack of the 11.9. opened the Bush government suddenly the possibility to exclude the global war against terror and in this context for a long time of many in the Bush-governed plan of an intervention in maturous and geopolitical central Iraq (Bush against Hussein, II. act?To). The war in Afghanistan was previously the immediate response, which was approved worldwide, diplomatically important and strategically also paying interesting to Iran, also paying for the axis of boses, after the fall of the Hussein regime in a clasp handle with solid militar stall points. However, in front of the invasion, the Farce was staged at the building of world policy to legitimize them with a Security Council Decision and False Provements for the existence of mass destruction and relations with Al Qaeda.
It was a coarse but slightly more transparent theater where the US government is the terrorist attack of the 11.9. Taking utilized to expand the power world and domestic policy and pursue strategic goals. Standing under high political and moral prere, many governments played, even if they rejected the war against Iraq, but long as it was alleged to legitimize the war by the Bush government by a UN Resolution. The US government made it clear at the same time that the war with the "Coalition of the willing" be carried out without jerking of the UN to free the world from the rogue Hussein. Probably also with the intention that the UN is not completely deconstructed as a paper tiger, many have played the diplomatic farce of the seemance decisions more or less tooth-riding to the end, but with the result that the reports of the weapon inspectors then set aside and below Massive prere adopted resolution was reinterpreted by the US government as war legitimation. As is known, Blair and Bush have always claimed until shortly before the war that no decision was made to war, Hussein must only fulfill all conditions.
Another Generation is Fighting A New was Against at Enemy That Threatens The Peace and Stability of the World. Across The Globe, Our Military Is Standing Directly Between Our People And The Worst Dangers in The World, And Americans Are Grateful To Have BRAVE DEFENDERS. The War On Terror Has Brought Great Costs. For Those Who Have Lost Loved Ones in Afghanistan And Iraq, Today Is A Day of Last Letters and Fresh Tears. BECAUSE OF THE SACRIFICES OF OUR MEN AND WOMEN IN UNIFORM, TWO TERROR REGIMES ARE GONE FOREVER, Freedom is on the March, And America is more secure.
US Prasident Bush yesterday at Commemorates Memorial Day
Even if the decision to engage out of the day of the hour in Iraq, it was allowed to have been allowed in September 2001, so completely different political and military preparations had to be taken for the suppression of the Taliban regime. Recently, Times had already published a memo of the British Government, which shows that they stood under gross prere from the US government before July 2002 (the US and Iraq). In the memo it is called that US Prasident Bush is determined, military because of the "Connection of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction" Take against Iraq, even if the appointment is not yet fixed. War "inevitable". The US government has already increased its activities to put prere on Iraq. But the fundamentation for that was invalid, the desire for a change of regime is, so the Attorney General is quoted, legally not admitted. An attack can only be legitimate if it was self-defense or has been violated a UN Resolution.
So it obviously no longer went about whether the Iraq has really weapons of mass destruction and whether he blunts them, but about the construction of a war ground. Interestingly, here is also already noted by British side that the US government should hardly talk about the situation after a war. The military invasion plans, on the other hand, have already been developed largely. In the memo then the proposal will be made that you should raise the farce with the UN and the weapon inspectors:
Saddam does not threaten his neighbors and his passes to weapons of mass destruction are lower than those in Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work out a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam so that he rejects the in-weapon inspectors. This was helped with the legal legitimacy for the application of violence.
Apparently, Blair hoped that Hussein did not leave the inspectors into the country. That was easier made easier, justifiable mass destruction and regime change associated with insofar as the regime of mass destruction arms. But Hussein fell at least on this trap does not come in (brought out of the kick).
Now the Times has received further information that makes it clear again that in reality the war preparations have already begun in the spring of 2002 after the suppression of the Taliban regime. From mid-2002, the number of bombing attacks on Iraqi positions increased dramatically to provoke the regime and prepare the invasion. In the second half of 2002, twice as much bombs were dropped, as a total of the year before. The British aircraft increased their throwth even stronger than the American. British and US aircraft allegedly monitored on the basis of a UN resolution, but without exemplary approval, which in the south and north for the protection of the Shiites and Kurds established aircraft zones (what is a violation of the Iraq resolution?To). The tangible bombardment was justified by alleged attacks on the aircraft, which protested Hussein regime and claimed, especially civilian goals were shot.
Although this is not long ago, but also new information about the process that has not yet brought peace to Iraq and has sustainably damaged politics, do not seem to have a gross effect (from the truth at first sight). The rivers have fallen, at the decisions is nothing more and probably will not change on the bea of power in the future, most of them will think and get into progressive joints.
IF True, Thesistions Indicate That Not Only Had Our Nation Secretly and Perhaps Illegally aged to go to War by The Summer of 2002, But That WE Had Gone On to Take Specific and Tangible Military Actions Before Asking Congress Or The United Nations for Authority.
John Conyers
US Congressman under the spring-carrying of the democratic deputy John Conyers have written a letter to the US prasidents and asked them to answer some questions a few questions, for the memo, the Congress Bush has only been eliminated in October 2002 to go to war. That is probably not done. The spokesman of the woman’s house, Scott McClellan, had already made clear in mid-May that the government see no reason to respond to the letter, and that nothing was in the amption, one has the intelligence information about the alleged mass destruction in 2002 for the War rightdated:
The Suggestion is Just Flat-Out Wrong. Anyone Who Wants To Know How The Intelligence What Used Only Has To Go Back and Read Everything That What Said in Public About The Lead-Up To The War.