A study asks if the US has a moral commitment to the admission of escape strings in the Middle East
When in the fall of last year daily several thousands of the Balkan route came to Germany and the reception of heated discussions was performed, frequently referred to the transatlantic federal partner and friend. Why do not the US participate in the reception of war escape, was put forward. Finally, their political leadership started with the war in Iraq, which has developed as a result to the disaster in the Middle East. The US must take responsibility for this, so the claim.
A study by US Think Tanks Brooking Institutions now wanted to learn the attitude of Americans. The investigation is pretty new, it dates from the end of Marz, the sample is not very rough, but with 1.580 participants (from representative panels) already meaningful. Interesting are the differences between the two political camps, which are the focus of the study. They are roughly.
This is already evident in the question of the general support for the admission of escape "From the conflict zones in Syria and other countries of the Middle East". Overall, a significant majority of 59 percent speaks; 41 percent do not support the recording.
The most significant is the support under the Democrats (77%) and the youngian (18-34 years) (68%). The opposition to accommodate escape strikes was essentially pronounced among the attachments of Donald Trump (77 percent). In the respondents who identified politically with the Party of Republicans ( Partisan Identification), in contrast, fewer, namely 63 percent, spoke against the inclusion of war escape from Syria and the Middle East.
Trump trail: No moral commitment to the admission of escape
If it’s about the question of whether Americans get a moral commitment to help escape from Iraq, Syria and Libya, so brief the differences in the camps. In the supportors of Trump there is a significant negation of such an obligation. 69 percent in the case Iraq, 74 in case Syria and 77 percent in the case of Libya.
Overview of all camps, the answers are slightly different. After all, a majority of 54 percent of spurt "Somewhat" A moral commitment towards Iraqi escape, the Syrians are 51 percent and the escape from Libya is 49 percent.
Overall, 56 percent of respondents ame that "the Iraq war has played a significant role in the expiration that led to the Syrian escape crisis. 31 percent recognize one "small role". For 11 percent, the Iraq war does not matter in this context.
Even among the Republicans show a certain problem awareness. 44 percent ame that the Iraq war played a significant role in the escape crisis, 18 percent confess to him a small role.
The TRUMP trail will hardly differ here. 42 percent of the Iraq war a decisive role for the consequences, but a gross share, namely 37 percent, is convicted that he has played a role, though a small, played.
In the appendants of Democrats, 67% of the segregation that the Iraq war has played a significant role and 25 percent believe that he played a small role. The camp of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sandler is in the trend of Democrats. The values for the significant role are 68, respectively 69 percent, in the small role at 25 and 23 percent.
Against all measures that bring more escape to the country
No surprise is that the proportion of Republicans, which are bolted against all the measures, which became the country more than 75 percent, is twice as high as the proportion under the Democrats, which are the same segregation (34 percent).
When asked, if the USA more than 10.Taking 000 escape, as it is currently scheduled, the study asked the study in all the camps of high average numbers2. He is 35 at the Republicans.618, in the Democrats at 64.475 and at the "Independant" at 83.309. The median is at the Republicans at 10.000, in the Democrats at 15.000.