Image: https: // dan-news.info
Were discussed alleged discrepancies of the JIT investigation, but it remained unclear what role Malaysia, which should have rejected the technical line, played at the beginning of these
On the 15th. to 17. August found the international conference in Malaysia "MH17: The Quest for Justice" took place in which the criminal investigation of the joint investigation team JIT was criticized and criticized with tunnel views of Russia. As a result of the meeting organized under the participation of the government, it is called upon to postpone the planned process start in Marz in the Netherlands, to set the persecution of the four previously defendants and to start a new procedure, the further findings. Kees van der Pijl, who wrote a book to MH17, was there as a guest, the organizer published his personal collapse. Nik Afanasyev also published a report on the conference on Friday: West Far East Conflict.
The Malaysian head of government Mahathir Mohamad, who previously pretended to the JIT a unilateral orientation on Russia, was asked to give the demands reprint. As a member of the Jit besides the Netherlands, Belgium, Australia and Ukraine, Malaysia could at least manifest that Jit did not unanimously have the conclusion that the help of Russian soldiers with a Russian Buk the MH17 was shot down, perhaps also could be threatened with a Veto.
Talks made by the SBU manipulated?
On the International Movement For A Just World (Just), organized by the Perdana Global Peace Foundation (PGPF) and the Canadian Center for Research on Globalization, was at the beginning of the documentary "MH17 — Call for Justice" of Yana Yerlashova, a Fruheren RT journalist, and from the Dutch Blogger Max Van der Werff.
On the podium SAB beside Yerlashova also akash roses, the land of IT Forensic Services and certified audio specialist. He claims in the film that with his team he had analyzed and found out with his team of the Ukrainian intelligence service SBU to the JIT, which serve as evidence that they were manipulated, cut and fitted differently. In a detailed documentation, you have published your results. Over, they follow traces and witnesses that on the day Ukrainian fighters were on the road, which quickly stalks.
Analysis of the covered speech in the movie
The filmmakers like the conference organizers prior to pursuing a certain explanation, but to point out the allegedly many open questions that are not considered by the JIT, which also refuses to pick up the offer of private mediator Josef Resch, which determined by him during a job Submit documents in the presence of the press. Resch had searched for an unknown client for a reward of 15.5 million US dollars after a witness with prove for the guilty and supposedly found.
In the film, the German Luftechtsjurist Elmar Giemulla is a word, which complains against Ukraine at the European court for Human Rights (ECHR) against Ukraine, because they did not block the airspace on the war area in the Ostucraine (the EGMR prints off a decision). He claimed that the SBU’s intelligence service "proofs" not be used with coarse caution. At the conference, the lawyer Gurdial Singh Nijar, a Fruher Legal Professor and Prasident of the Malaysian Human Rights Society, also brought the idea into the game as Giemulla drove a civil suit against Ukraine. The former Lufthansa pilot Peter Haienko was also invited and recovered his long stranded thesis that the machine was not shot down by a Buk, but probably from a fighter aircraft.
Transfer of the flyers to Lieutenant Sakri. Screenshot from the movie
FBI wanted to take the tickets
Uncertainty continues to prevail how the JIT deals with Malaysia. The fact is that Malaysia was recorded after half a year in the JIT, although it was a Malaysian machine and Malaysian burgers were also victim. By contrast, Ukraine Fruh was admitted, although she was involved in the war and had no victims to complain. Supposedly there was a secrecy agreement here, according to the information that is published, consensus must prevail. Despite the criticism of the Government Malaysia, however, the investigation results were apparently expressed without an official Veto Malaysia of the Office.
At the conference and in the documentary, however, Lieutenant Sakri was a word, who flew into Ukraine on behalf of the then head of government Najib Razak in Ukraine to ensure that the bodies are confidentally recovered. Allegedly, Kiev wanted to prevent him from coming to the launch of the separatists controlled by the separatists. They should then never get there and had without problems the two flyers on 21. Get a negotiated. On the jerk trip to Kharkiv then FBI agents had tried to take the flyers in themselves, which could prevent his team after re-language with Najib. The Malaysian ambassador in Kiev, but then overturned the Dutch Safety Board, who has passed on British experts from the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AIB).
Open questions
Allegedly, Malaysian officials had never received insight into the raw data, but they had only received what AIB has released. According to the report of the Dutch Safety Board, there were no warnings or evidence of security ies from the records, the records should have ended abruptly.
It was also discussed whether Malaysia should have been offered the technical leadership at JIT, which rejected the government. Supposedly one was overloaded because of the search for the MH370 lost in Marz 2014 and therefore did not want to take this over, also the fallace was too far away, said Datuk Seri Azharuddin Abd Rahman, the former head of the authority for civil aviation. He in turn claimed that one had downloaded the raw data of the tickets, as they wanted to know what had happened in the last seconds. It is unclear to what extent Malaysia occurs only as a hilder of Russia, which the JIT investigations are also considered as one-sided and monovers that many information has not been considered considerable.
Or there is so many laughing in the government’s knowledge of the JIT investigation that the demand for a new investigation investigation after all sides is entitled, especially since the Jit seems to be a will to take instructions in another direction go to Moscow. The Dutch ambassador to the conference was invited but not there. A planned event with family-class victims did not materialize. Aming is suspected of conference participants that the message could have removed here. But it could also be that they did not want to be instrumentalized or give the JIT version believe.
Russia was held during the conference in the background. Yesterday, however, the chairman of the Security Council visited Russia, Nikolai Patrushev, the Malaysian Defense Minister Mohamad Sabu, to talk about the investigation of the launch of MH17. Little surprisingly, Patrushev agreed to the Minister Prosident Mahathir Mohamad, who is the JIT "Unpainted and premature allegations" had criticized. Apart from Russian and Malaysian media, the conference was otherwise hardly perceived.